What is an unexplored life?
Each of us asks the question several times in life – what is the meaning of a person’s life and whether it exists?
Life is a process which is very difficult to describe in words. People use this concept to describe the activities of all beings on earth. Life is a priceless gift given to us by nature.
What is an unexplored life? This is an interesting but difficult question. There is not a correct answer to it, especially one. Set goals for yourself: to learn, to develop, to discover new things, to study sciences, to learn the unknown. Imagine yourself doing absolutely nothing, just waiting for the end of the day. Or imagine yourself living from one party to another, from entertainment to entertainment. Does it make sense to you?!
Socrates and the unexamined life
For Socrates, the way of life coincided with his way of thinking. This was typical of the entire philosophy of that era.
Socrates is famous for saying: “An unknown life is not worth living!” What does he mean by that? What is so valuable about studying your own life?
Socrates believed that living a life by the rules of others, in a continuous routine, is not worth living. You need to study what you really want from life.
It is indeed possible to speculate and reflect on Socrates’ statement. But it is not the only correct one. The theory that all unexplored lives have no purpose and should not be lived is unreasonable and simply wrong.
There are much more things that contribute to the happiness and well-being of a person, besides “studying his life.” Factors such as life experience, communication with family, things to be grateful for, memories and achieving success in life. Everything that makes a person happy, and a happy life, of course, should be lived, regardless of whether it is studied or not.
The philosophy of Epicurus is the teaching of the ancient Greek philosopher about happiness, pleasure and suffering. Epicurus and his followers saw their main goal to teach people to be happy without paying attention to unimportant things.
Two philosophers Epicurus and Socrates viewed life from different sides, analyzed and treated it differently.
Epicurus, on the contrary, did not believe that people could anger the gods. He claimed that they were too powerful to be bothered by the actions of mortals. Instead, he considered the gods to be a role model for humanity. He argued that it is necessary to try to achieve their level of happiness and self-realization.
Another philosophy belongs to Michel de Montaigne. Michel Montaigne was not a professional scientist, philosopher or theologian, but in the course of his activity he turned to the problem of man, putting the analysis of his personality in the center of attention. De Montaigne would have experienced an increasing degree of doubt and disagreement about Socrates’ assertion that “an unexamined life is not worth living””
De Montaigne had a completely opposite approach to how to live a happy life compared to Socrates. Socrates believed that excessive analysis and study of our lives would lead to the best, while De Montaigne would advise us to spend less time on excessive analysis and rethinking things. Because this leads to uncertainty, without which we are all much better off.
I need help with writing assignment
Get online help from trusted experts in any field of study.
Need help with study work? We have assistance in writing educational papers. Writerben is a secure transaction service. Choose the best performers with a guarantee of fulfilling your order on time and without overpayments.